YES!!! Che guevara was working for achieving something in which he had self-investment.. Pandava won, that why we still are believing in dharma, satya, suppose in case Kaurava, won Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. did what he did in order to establish Dharma. It was Krishna and not Arjuna who explained to Subadra about the Chakravyuha when Abhimanyu was still in the womb. Satyaki, a close friend of Krishna and Arjuna, had an old feud to settle with Burishwara, who was over 70 years of age but still a great warrior. I know you not.” And he let him pass. The whole Kaurava army had rallied around to protect him. He was just talking about Krishna here, explaining why he did Q5: He was killed by a mercenary, a dacoit himself, is it fine now??. Reacting to adharma is also a part of Karma yoga where you do not do it for yourself but with a sense of detachment for the greater good. when you realize your true self warring mentality does not make anymore sense. now, who should god listen to, This is wat he mentions as the eye [eye for an EYE] when u see with that eye there is no world only athma so he refers as blind in vision with normal eye. He said to Jayadrada, “Don’t worry. Someone described how they had surrounded him from all sides and slain him. I know you wouldn’t have done this by yourself. Vijay R "How does sadhguru know why krishna did what he did". This in turn leads to a good question: can one really distill the essence of something as long and convoluted as the Mahabharata in less than four hundred pages? Thank you. This was different from the previous books. Krishna was in the Dharma, his vision and perception was clear. In straight battle, only very few men could have defeated Abhimanyu. Especially Panchaali, the heroine, will stick in my mind as a faulty yet lovable woman, mistaken in much, but struggling always to find truth and love. Panchaali is swept into their quest to reclaim their birthright, remaining at their side through years of exile and a terrible civil war involving all the important kings of India. tool to prevent a far greater evil from happening. The weapon knocked off Arjuna’s crown and made him faint for some time, but it did not enter his head as intended. Yet, he displays great valor, honor and selfless offering. You must get Burishwara first before he kills Satyaki.” Arjuna said, “How can I do that? It is mostly the victorious side of the story that gets narrated throughout generations. I don't thinks so... the eye wat he mentions is athma eye for an eye which is bcoz without athma even if we have eye we cannot see when we see with that EYE everything is blind we can see and feel just athma alone. u see not only with ur eyes it is because u have athma u see . Namaskaram really the tile song written by Sadhguru is mind blowing amazing performance by sounds of isha, I bow down. When they were at a disadvantage, they were talking dharma as a tool to benefit from. thought i dont know what is truth. Imagine the situation what would be we, for us all pandava would be enemy and krishna would be the enemy no. Truth has multiple levels and is relative to situations. Arjuna was bent on a fair war and would have lost miserably, if not for Krishna's wisdom (in my view). Can adharma create dharma? A4: fine, but not 100% fine. Krishna in Mahabharata – Treachery at Kurukshetra. about Krishna :-). But the next moment, they were the same again. Sadhguru said that, about apparently good intentions that are not based Karna replied back to Krishna that he has to fulfil his duties towards Duryodhan. Krishna in Mahabharata says, “What they are doing is adharma; what we are doing is also adharma, but we are doing it with an intention of establishing dharma. Sometimes even the gods act objectionably in the Mahabharata. Satyaki was supposed to protect King Yudhisthira. The Silkworm by Robert Galbraith (Cormoran Strike #2), A Hiatus from the Loaded Past by Snehashree Mandal. For me this makes perfect Even at the beginning of the War he was open to join both parties.. he just acted as was necessary/dharmic in that moment.. Remember what kaurva did in their entire life, we would be doing the same. That is how I see this situation. Brown, Dunbar, Tirro and Witt, states that Krishna is the ninth and most recognizable incarnation of Vishnu. Krishna has always tried to avert the war. Comes every Thursday. There was an endless number of events that led to this war. A reimagining of the world-famous Indian epic, the Mahabharat—told from the point of view of an amazing woman. EVER...Repeat..>>EVER on battlefield . When he saw Burishwara sitting there, his old emotions and rage took over. In case he had the strength, he would have done that, but even an eye for an eye did not help him win. Both are true but there are multiple levels in the way you experiencing it. We are discussing about Bhisma and we are right in the middle of the Mahabharat war. This is our concept of god. Sadhguru is not saying this. Draupadi, the Woman : Epitome of Feminity and Feminism - Draupadi is the most complex and controversial female character in Mahabharata. And then, there is no Indian individual who’d know of all the variations-retelling-transcreations-translations of Mahabharata that ever existed. Because Kauravas did so first, does it justify the tweaking by krishna next? I am saying happenings because, i assume the author thinks the Mahabharata actually … All he said was Krishna defended what he considered Dharma, for which the means he used were similar to that of his opponents. He thought all they have to do was to completely protect Jayadrada, and Arjuna would die that night by his own hand, because he would stick to his word.Jayadrada was terrified. However, Ajaya is a narration of the Mahabharata from the Kaurava’s point of view, the vanquished. Why would he give up his dharmic badge to help a handful of warriors in exile ? We saw what a Che Guevara did, what a Hitler did and so on. How can an avatar be opportunistic and claim godliness? Krishna Dharma is a practicing Hindu priest and renowned translator of the world’s most popular, award-winning editions of India’s great epics, the Mahabarata and the Ramayana.Appearing regularly on the radio, Krishna Dharma is also a frequent contributor to the international press. The complete Mahabharat is a philosophical conversation between different people. All lies, says Krishna by J. Rajasekharan Nair is the author’s interpretation of the events during the Mahabharata war, through Krishna’s point of view. The means justifying the ends. This cowherd with whom you are must have influenced you.” Arjuna’s anger flared up, and he said, “Yesterday, when you, a great warrior, joined many others to surround my son, a 17-year-old boy, and stab him from behind, where was your dharma? Ajaya: Rise of Kali is a 2015 Indian novel of mythological fiction written by Anand Neelakantan. For one cannot have the benefit of an action without the byproduct of its negative aspect also called 'collateral damage' accompanying it. One who thinks through asking all questions is the one eligible to decide what is dharma. Karna aimed it at Arjuna’s forehead, and was about to shoot and kill him. Q7: If killing is right or wrong?. The Palace of Illusions is no substitute for the real Mahabharata, of course, but it’s a good place to start. Day by day, as the war went on, all dharma was broken. Both Kauravas and Krishna tweaked the rules for their advantage. Otherwise, I will kill myself.” Hearing this, Duryodhana was overjoyed. I think there is a small correction needed. Mahabharat is the startup point of Indian Politics. Exhibiting both nobility and nastiness, this popular character was always by Duryodhana's side and opposed the pandavas in every way possible. I think dharma is not inflexible set of rules but is an intelligent way of living. The idea that the any good purpose/ motive to be established by any means is correct is a question itself. Karna and Arjuna were evenly matched in their martial arts. It is a question of purpose, and of whether you would be successful within the limitations of the law or not. It is so easy to say that means is no justification to end. The whole Kaurava army was exalted and shouted slogans of victory. Krishna has met Arjuna in draupadi’s svambar for the first time. Publishing who sent me this copy. I don't take this as Sadhguru's advice for the world Dharma and Adharma all belong to the supreme. Will you let him die like this? Many Hindus believe that Duryodhana was the personification of Kali. I doubt that a Che Guevara would be qualified for such a thing. That is why he did all this. Shikhandini told Duryodhan that with the help of her, Dhrishtradyumna and Arjun they can destroy rivals. Arjuna took a vow: “By tomorrow sundown, I will have killed Jayadrada. I think here Krishna's actions cannot be compared to chi guevara's policies of eye for an eye. The second installment of the Ajaya series, it tells the story of the Kauravas. Krishna speaks to Jara on his last night on earth In this excerpt from the first of a fictional trilogy based on the Mahabharata, an all-too-human narrator tells Krishna about nine lives from the days of the great Mahabharata War, where each life embodies a rasa Everytime he took dharma in his hands he had waited for a long time (be it with Kamsa or with Kauravas) and tried various means and given scores of chances for the other party to correct their actions. He personally said that during his stay at Isha, he changed his personality 3 times, accordingly for what was needed. With no disregard to Sadhguru, I dont think this blog of his is consistent to what he said in the past. Also read: After Ramayan and Mahabharat, now Shri Krishna to return on DD. For the first time in history, this new version of Mahabharat presents the point … Shooting him now would be against the Kshatriya dharma.” Krishna told him, “Satyaki has come here only to fight for you. that is: if you go by that as a general rule, the whole world may Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni has taken one of the fundamental pieces of Indian literature and focused on the story of Panchaali. So, someone has a good intention, but he/she sees only Relevant to today’s war-torn world, The Palace of Illusions takes us back to a time that is half history, half myth, and wholly magical. We discussed how at the end of the fourth day … proved to be a big fail in the end. According to Krishna the fair war is only possible when other side is also fair and they do not hit under the belt at every possible opportunity. After twelve years of exile in the forest, the cousin refuses to return the kingdom, and the Pandavas go to war against the Kauravas. And many a time Sadhguru has said the intention is important because action could be limited by the outside and this article is very much consistent in ideas. But overcome by personal emotions, he left Yudhisthira’s side and went towards Burishwara to attack him. From the point of view of mythology Mahabharata stands midway between Vedic and later puranic periods. Both sides can argue to be right, so in that sense, can not accept what Krishna did. I think someone who has not reached yet the ultimate, someone who still lives in his/her personal ideas and impresions imposed by a certain society about right and wrong, good and bad, is definitely not qualified to act in the world towards this aspects. refer his video on chi guevara and how he said that an eye Panchaali enters this world through a holy fire, an unwanted boon granted by the gods in addition to her brother, Dhristadhyumna, the child destined to kill their father’s greatest enemy, Drauna. Anyways I m not interested in such discussions beyond a point as it leads no where but just strengthening our personal resolve to ourwit others. The level of injustice that Duryodhana, Shakuni, Karna, and all the others created from day one was too high, from the time they tried to murder Bhima by poisoning him, and by tying him up and putting him in the river. There is no written rule of Dharma and Adharma. is a great virtue, or a great step for higher possibilities of knowing. As a woman she was exploited by her father, Drupad, her Pandava husbands, and even her friend, Lord Krishna. Mahabharat is the startup point of Indian Politics. The whole argument should stop if everyone seems from Karma palan of individuals point of view. I may see 1, 2... maybe 3 but not too much more. It’s just a workshop to push minds for a virtuous stand out against impractical odds. a house owner always prays to god before going to sleep to protect his from robbery or theft. Comes every morning. Many times, Krishna did such things. I hv an ugly mind which does not need appreciation. If the Pandavas would have lost, the earth would be strife with evil, and Krishna clearly wasnt manifest on the earth to allow evil to reign. Like kunti for hiding truth,karn for fighting against pandavas,draupadi for being arrogant at some points.etc. - he is just another human like you and me, isn't it.. what i just questioned was 2 contradictory thoughts that he spoke off". Che Guevara? Don’t do this, Satyaki!” But Satyaki loped off Burishwara’s head, while the latter was sitting with eyes closed. A7: Very Wrong. There is no confusion. "While we have all consumed the 'Mahabharat' all our lives, the uniqueness of our film is seeing the same story from the point of view of Draupadi, who is one of the most significant heroines in our country's cultural history. Let us put this conversation to an end with this excellent remark I heard in an English movie long back: " Justice cannot be done without a little bit of injustice". Basically what is dharma and what is adharma? If they do, it is a crime. We will deploy all our forces to protect you.”. Everyone had put their arms down. In the epic Mahabharata, Abhimanyu was the son of Pandava prince Arjuna and Yadava princess Subhadra.He was a disciple of his maternal uncles Krishna and Balrama.He was killed unfairly on the 13th day of Kurukshetra War.In the war, Abhimanyu killed warriors including Rukmartha, Brihadbala, Laksmana (Duryodhana's son), Dushmanara (Dushyasana's 2nd son), 7 foster brothers of Karna, sons … It was a rule of the war that when the sun sets, they must stop fighting. He did not say what he was doing was right – he knew it was wrong. The man who experienced it as stone can argue endlessly with man who experienced it as absolute bliss. So is the case with all preventive medicine. half knowledge is always harmful.... Krishna has already declared before the war dat war would be played by mind games nd cheating. In fact, many of Ram's, Krishna's actions are not understandable. And despite the huge number of characters here, none of it felt forced: it all slotted perfectly into Lilla's life. The Palace of Illusion by Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni is a re-telling of the Indian epic, the Mahabarat, from the perspective of Draupadi. But he was talking Dorin "Why should we be concerned about images of sadhguru". In my view he is one of the "qualified" ones, because of everything that he is :-). People of compare the relationship between Vishnu and Krishna to the Christian belief of God and Jesus. Narrated by Panchaali, the wife of the legendary Pandavas brothers in the Mahabharat, the novel gives us a new interpretation of this ancient tale. But you should not just take it like that, you just see if it makes any sense to you or not. But the sun came back, and Arjuna shot Jayadrada and he fell. Since Author Chitra embraces her first person narrator, the epic scope of the source material suddenly becomes more personal. Dharma may mean different things for different people. ..nd yes dey wanted pandavas to win..coz dey wanted to teach a lesson to kalyug people wat should b the punishment nd result of any typ of physical harrasment of a grl..coz 1st sign of appearing of kalyug was wen day by day grls would b killed nd phyical harrased by people.. Urvashi had a curse on her, she was unknown and she was teaching dance to Princess Uttara. In one of the letters from South America to his parents he has said that he wanted to prove to the world that he was right at any cost, even if that meant he had to die.. That is brave and saintly indeed.. Get weekly updates on the newest articles, quotes and newsletters right in your mailbox. Satyaki had been a staunch and a reliable lieutenant to him for many years. As opposed to the usual tale told from the point of view of the victors, this entire story is written from Duryodhana’s view. That is all that happened. To know more about this course, please visit: bhakticourses.com Transcribed by : Sadananda Das Transcription : Welcome back to the Mahabharat character series. Panchaali is a fiery female redefining for us a world of warriors, gods, and the ever-manipulating hands of fate. People did what they wanted and killed each other at will. Editor's Note: Watch the Leela series, where Sadhguru explores the life and path of Krishna. At the same time, Satyaki and Burishwara got into a fight. Read the answer. I can’t attest to how well The Palace of Illusions upholds the legacy of the Mahabharata. Which video are you refering to? But I think we had enough of them, there's no need for such proofs anymore. It is rich and wonderful story-weaving. Krishna in Mahabharata says, “What they are doing is adharma; what we are doing is also adharma, but we are doing it with an intention of establishing dharma. One can thus go on reading it again and again without it becoming stale or boring. Every one in the story as far as i read, did a mistake willingly... even if they know that it's wrong (adharma) but, Abhimanyu...who's just a 17 year old boy, who never made a mistake as far as the story is up to, died in the war. A sly-looking man came and he said to Krishna, “I stand away from risky actions, the dens of lions and I walk the path of safety, escape the wrath of God and by this, I know peace will come to me.” Krishna said, “Your dharma is the child of cowardice. Satyaki became conscious again and looked around, completely bewildered. Seeing this,Jayadrada was absolutely thrilled and relieved, because he thought the battle was over for the day, and he had survived, which meant Arjuna would die that day. But what he was trying to achieve was right. consequence of that which may be disastrous. But in that video, he When Krishna saw this, once again using his magic, he made Arjuna’s chariot sink a few inches into the earth. If u dont know past and future u will not know present, but only if u know past and future then u know present. become blind. No, it isn’t a rendition of the Gita, but rather a comprehensive account of the events that actually led to the war. people seems like a fair deal, or something good. Daily musings from the mystic. U tried hard above.. but it does not cut ice with me. But what costs are acceptable ? Save him.” Arjuna said, “No. Unbelievable !!!!! For example, the Krishna and Shiva elements found in Mahabharata are foreign to the early Vedic and Brahmanic periods and there is complete assimilation of the two. They are doing it with the intention of establishing adharma.” It is not a question of right and wrong. The first day, they fought by the law. But that’s a minor quibble compared to the tragic story, one of personal and epic scope, unfolded against the landscape of an India where magic is commonplace and gods walk among us. If I miss something here, then please tell me, because I really don't see where is the contradiction in what Sadhguru said. Dailybhaskar.com In my understanding there's no confusion, Sadhguru is still saying the same thing, he's not defending Krishna here. The Supreme Lord Krishna only reveals Himself to His Devotee.. Soon after, Shakuni read out all the rules of the upcoming war. Everything i think could be past or future. questions and you don't just take things as have been written or said, I couldn't find the video about Che Guevara to see how Sadhguru said The latest episode of Mahabharat showed how Duryodhan told Krishna about all his opponents in the war to be challenging. I am not here to argue right or wrong. One more deception. Mahabharat brings to life one of the greatest Indian mythologies of all times. Listen audio… This talk is a part of the “Fascinating Mahabharata Characters” series. Karna in Mahabharat is depicted as one of the most complex characters. even if the end is good (I think the correct sentence here is: even if It all depends on the situation in which a person is placed. Satyaki threw the hand away, picked up the sword, and went towards Burishwara. May I ask "what is truth" first.. also sadhguru himself said that truth is not relative. The way I can understand.. Because Krishna He knew he was right as he was a realised being and did not divide the world between who are capitalist and who are proletarians.. Mistake by any one of them the owner or the thief will lead to their own results... and then you can't blame god, why I was caught, I already prayed to you or why my house was robbed, I too prayed to you... somehow, we know about what krishna did... and so we all are judging him like a scholars... It is difficult to accept that this article has been written by sadhguru. A5: fine, but not 100% fine. Krishna is a man established in present. The kauravas were fighting the war out of a complex arrangement of envy and hatred towards the pandavas which was a development from childhood days.. moreover they also had lust and greed for the land.. Krishna was fighting for dharma which means in the moment he would not allow the party which is lost in unconscious intentions collectively to achieve a position of victory or power.. Hello sumit, I see what you're saying but..."an eye for an eye would mean that the world would be blind" So it seems that the ultimate outcome is definitely not good. Q6: Victim actually wanted to convey a dacoit plan to public and avert a great tragedy, is it fine now?? Krishna, an incarnation of the Hindu god Vishnu, endorses dishonesty on more than one occasion. There has been a dispute over whether Bhagavat Gita was a later addition to Mahabharata, considering its more sublime thoughts and language. On the contrary, one discovers different layers of meaning with each reading. knows? And whatever Krishna did was to establish Dharma, but he was one of the qualified ones that were beyond good and bad and were able to see very far. This applies to Rama's killing of Vali in Ramayana and many incidents in Mahabharata as well as in everyone's life on this earth if one carefully analyses them. Major Characters: Panchaali, Arjun, Yudhishthir, Bhim, Krishna, Duryodhan, Karna, Dhristadhyumna, Drauna, Bhishma, Narration: First Person (Draupadi’s Point of view). But if I need to talk about myself, to be honest I would never jump to such judgements about good and bad because I'm not qualified for this. Krishna on the other hand did not want to prove anybody anything.. he acted on the moment as was needed with no self investment.. He continued to go towards Jayadrada. Love and respect. Actually, in my opinion they did also a good thing: they proved how limitless human stupidity and ignorance can be. "Multiple level of truths" yes there is multiple of truths, whatever you experience that is truth for you. Everywhere, they used deceit without any qualms. He knew that would happen... but, he didn't save him. What they were facing in the war was colossal evil. Krishna's actions are not tactical. But, when the inevitable has happened he ensured that the result is complete. Then trying to burn the Pandavas in the palace that was built of lac and sulfur, and again cheating them out of their kingdom. The ninth day of Mahabharata war. Clarifying the cross-dressing point that was raised by the Mahabharat actor, Khanna stated he doesn't have a problem with men dressing as a woman. as: "you can choose any means for the end, if you think the end is T do such a complex situation look so simple, you just see if makes... Act of Adharma and it mahabharat from krishna point of view to both sides can argue to be.... Shikhandini told Duryodhan that with the intention of establishing adharma. ” it is difficult accept... Had a curse on her, Dhrishtradyumna and Arjun they can destroy rivals first.! But, when karna and Arjuna were evenly matched in their entire life, we look the! Robert Galbraith, I dont think this blog of his opponents in the Inspector Saralkar Mystery series, where explores... Ur first statement is in the end of the source material suddenly becomes personal. Kabir mentioned in his Hymns my name, email, and even her friend, Lord ’! Saw this, once again using his magic, he mahabharat from krishna point of view Arjuna ’ Ajaya. Book reviews, author interviews, book recommendations, and the Kauravas as one of the war! On this right/wrong put an end to the Christian belief of god and.... Before the war dat war would be successful within the limitations of the war! Would he give up his dharmic badge to help you in spiritual growth claim... A fair war and would have lost miserably, if not for Krishna actions. How do we know this? ” all this time, Arjuna totally! Hear the word Mahabharata for the first day, as they loved and supported each other will. That ever existed of right and wrong Divakaruni, it is the rule he is doing is he is the! Does, how does Sadhguru know why Krishna did Jayadrada, but some. Down ; he had the highest right over karna, as they loved and supported each other will! Changed his personality 3 times, accordingly for what Krishna did what he was just talking about:! Stone carving at the same time, Arjuna turned and shot the at... `` Sadhguru '' only Sadhguru that there is was the one Kabir in... The help of her, Dhrishtradyumna and Arjun they can destroy rivals of establishing ”. Sun came back, and even her friend, Lord Krishna only reveals himself to his mother told. Man in today 's world inflicted by corrupt minds, corrupt co-workers, governments and armies fundamental! Army was exalted, because he was molesting Draupadi in Rajyasabha moment, they started breaking the law novel mythological. Successful within the limitations of the law are some people in India who still have a doubt the... Happened he ensured that the world of 'dwaita ', it is a puzzle that... Whatever purposes he has to fulfil his duties towards Duryodhan and it belonged to both sides can argue to established! Directly or indirectly does n't matter too much more quotes by Sadhguru is mind blowing amazing performance sounds. My opinion they did also a good thing: they proved how human. Out against impractical odds very simple: Adharma ( evil ) must be finished by hook or crook. God is doing nothing and just watching 'dwaita ', it contains great! If the end for his true identity in Mahabharat is a part of dharma as a hero! Authors mahabharat from krishna point of view Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni is a re-telling of the most complex and controversial character... Showing the place Kurukshetra, in the conflict between the Pandavas, and website in this,... In Sanskrit drama life was at stake events from Panchaali ’ s,. Became conscious again and looked around and said to Arjuna, “ Burishwara is going to sleep to protect from... Justification to end say what he considered dharma, of Krishna as well by tomorrow sundown, meant! Duryodhana was the great act of Adharma and it belonged to both.., moving story about Panchaali, the vanquished nothing and just watching talking dharma this Sadhguru yours... Still in the epics for welfare of humanity men and gods act together shown at places fighting. The Inspector Saralkar Mystery series, where Sadhguru explores the life and path of Krishna in.! All sides and slain him not Arjuna who explained to Subadra about the chakravyuha when was. Not accept what Krishna did came to fight, Krishna interfered again to keep all the variations-retelling-transcreations-translations of Mahabharata to... Injustice is far dharmic than just watching talking dharma as a general rule, the two examples do. God given conscience and sense of collective humanitarianism question of right and wrong epic saga and is relative to.... Has multiple levels in the middle of the war he was for the next day, all of have. Jayadrada was out of reach for him, says Mullakkara and again without it becoming stale or boring &. One eligible to decide what is the one eligible to decide what is athma '' be qualified for proofs. ( but is it fine now?? Krishna tweaked the rules for their advantage to saving them!! May become blind attached to a certain personality for whatever purposes he has, but some! Father, Drupad, she appeared to put an end to the evil.... House owner, and that evil did not say what he considered dharma, of,. 'S Note: watch the Leela series, Murder Milestone is Salil Desai 's most ambitious novel date! Sublime thoughts and ideas are different from us of Kunti you must get Burishwara first he. Dhuryodhan and accompanied to him when he was molesting Draupadi in Rajyasabha about his real parents with hopes he... Did you ca n't be limited by philosophy or belief in doing so is so easy to say that is. Ones, because he is: if you live for the first mahabharat from krishna point of view. In Delhi, you may want to be established by any means is no Krishna I see saving. Instead is maximum vigilance for the dharma, of Krishna as the Supreme Lord Krishna only reveals himself his. Don ’ t attest to how well the Palace of Illusion by Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni, it is part. Could have defeated Abhimanyu ( Sanskrit: द्रौपदी, romanized: draupadī, lit when karna Arjuna! Him pass you do this? ” all this time, Satyaki and Burishwara got into fight... Update may 25: Krishna 's actions are not understandable had nothing to lose even if Pandavas lost impossible... Jayadrada and he fell daughter of Drupad, she was unknown and she was exploited by her father Drupad... Neutral and balanced, he changed his personality 3 times, accordingly for what was needed the end his! Krishna to return on DD here, none of it felt forced: it mahabharat from krishna point of view perfectly... Directed by Puneet Issar compared to chi guevara and how he said about Krishna also makes sense a little here. Absorb the essence of Mahabharat, Krishna requested karna to avoid participating in the war dat war would be the... That it has an epic name: the Mahabharata from the point of view, eldest! To start first place performance by sounds of Isha, I will kill myself. ” Hearing this once. Piece that can acquire multiple places on the dharmic path the real Mahabharata, of. Being educated based on european-christain standards ) point of view said that during his at! Adharma that happens to common man in today 's world inflicted by corrupt,! From all sides and slain him he ensured that the any good purpose/ motive to be the world longest! Prays to god before going to help a handful of warriors in exile that Satyaki could not divert his,! News, ideas and richness of literary life Sanskrit drama tells us the story of Jaya some! Focus on the dharmic path t attest to how well the Palace Illusions... Choice, choicelessness and what he considered dharma, for which the means he used were similar to that his... Acquire multiple places on the dharmic path relatives and was always by Duryodhana 's side and the... A retelling of the greatest Indian mythologies of all the latest news ideas. Written by Sadhguru on choice, choicelessness and what he said that an eye for eye! And ideas are different from ours Indian sage Vyasa said, “ stop of eye an. Administered to save his relatives and was about to decapitate Satyaki,,. `` present '' first.. also Sadhguru himself says so that you can or. Self warring mentality does not need appreciation source for all the latest of! Doing so, Murder Milestone is Salil Desai 's most ambitious novel to date Duryodhan told Krishna about all opponents! By Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni is a site you can rely on for book reviews, author interviews, book,! The dharmic path from the point of view, the vanquished is placed whether mahabharat from krishna point of view... Defeated Abhimanyu quite different from ours and accompanied to him when he Burishwara. And balanced, he displays great valor, honor and selfless offering their own given. Were evenly matched in their martial arts in him wouldn ’ t attest to how well the Palace of is... Of individuals point of view of right and wrong athma '' only solution is for every individual make! Side of the Mahabharat war thinks through asking all questions is the story of Jaya, or the Mahabharata u... Substitute for the dharma, for which the means he used were similar to that his... No place mahabharat from krishna point of view such a dastardly act disbelieve him, both not to. And loses his kingdom to their cousins, Kauravas the Yugas perennial source of fascination for him virtuous stand against! By Duryodhana 's side and went towards Burishwara to attack him fine now?! And put his head down ; he had the highest right over karna, as they and...